Vena Case Study: AvalonBay

AvalonBay’s team didn’t have a standardized way to record and analyze data away from the office, which means that not all details would be recorded for each opportunity. Ultimately, planning was built not just on a foundation of documentation and data, but also based on memory, incomplete information and gut-feel, leading to lost opportunities, risky investments, and missed company and market targets.

"We have the information that we need faster. Senior executives can make decisions faster, based on quantitative data."

Vena offered a solution that accommodated 650 users immediately, and allowed in-field employees to capture 500+ line items’ worth of cost details, allowing stakeholders to decide more confidently on whether or not a property development would be successful.

Previous Video
NAMI Spends 4x More Time Analyzing, Less Time Collecting Data
NAMI Spends 4x More Time Analyzing, Less Time Collecting Data

National Alliance on Mental Illness streamlines their budgeting and reporting processes to spend 4x more ti...

Next Flipbook
Vena Case Study: NAMI
Vena Case Study: NAMI

NAMI finds peace of mind in budgeting and reporting numbers.